IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No. 1555 of 2015 ---- Jani Toppo son of late Panchu Toppo, residence of village Pipra, PO Dudhickak (Kasba), P.S. Meharma, Dist Godda, at present residing at C/o Munki Urown, at village Masuriya, PO Itahri, PS Iashipur (Barahat) Dist. Bhagalpur. … Petitioner -versus- 1. The State of Jharkhand. 2. The Director General of Police, Jharkhand, Ranchi, Project Bhawan, Dhurwa, PO PS Dhurwa, Dist. Ranchi. 3. The Inspector General of Police, Jharkhand, Ranchi, Project Bhawan, Dhurwa, PO PS Dhurwa, Dist. Ranchi. 4. The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Jharkhand, Ranchi, Project Bhawan, Dhurwa, PO PS Dhurwa, Dist. Ranchi. 5. The Commandent, Jharkhand Armed Police at Hazaribag, PO PS Dist. Hazaribag. 6. The Superintendent of Police, Dumka (Santhal Pergana), PO PS Distt. Dumka. … Respondents ---- CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ---- For the Petitioner : Mr. Ranjan Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Respondents: Ms. Amrita Banerjee, AC to GP I ---- 12/ 30.01.2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents. 2. By filing this writ petition, petitioner has prayed to reinstate him on the post of Constable, Armed Police, Dumka after quashing the Order No.9/06 dated 06.01.2006 as by the aforesaid order, he has been removed from service. 3. The petitioner was appointed on the post of Constable on 19.08.2005 and was sent for training at Hazaribagh Training Centre. The petitioner was terminated on 06.01.2006 by the impugned order. 4. Admittedly, the petitioner was a Trainee Constable. During the training, he was found consuming alcohol and showed indisciplined behaviour. Medical examination was conducted and allegation was substantiated. Admittedly, the petitioner was on probation and his services were not confirmed, thus, he was removed from service. His appeal was also dismissed. 5. Since the petitioner showed utmost indiscipline during the training as he was drunk and the medical report, which is Annexure 3 to the writ -: 1 :- petition, also substantiated the aforesaid fact and the entire occurrence took place when the petitioner was a probationer, accordingly, he was removed from service. 6. I find no merit in this writ petition. I am not inclined to exercise my discretionary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. This writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed. Pending interlocutory applications, if any, stand disposed of. (Ananda Sen, J.) Kumar/Cp-02 -: 2 :-