Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 129753 (ALL)

SHASHANK SHEKHAR SHUKLA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SPECIAL SECY. DEPTT. GEOLOGY AND MINING LKO. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIC/2812/2025 · 2025-03-26

Om Prakash Shukla, Rajan Roy

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:17367-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 2812 of 2025 Petitioner :- Shashank Shekhar Shukla Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Special Secy. Deptt. Geology And Mining Lko. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rahul Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J. 1. Heard. 2. An application for interim relief filed by the petitioner before the revisional authority has been rejected. The relief sought was for restraining the opposite parties from creating third party rights, meaning thereby, the mining area be not settled with any other person. 3. We are of the opinion that whatever settlement is made during pendency of the revision, the same would be subject to the result of the revision, meaning thereby, if the revision succeeds, then obviously such settlement will go, however, if it fails then the matter would rest as it is, unless of course there is any other option available in law. With this clarification, we dispose of this Writ Petition especially as revision is fixed for final hearing on 09.04.2025 and we have no reason to believe that the same would not be decided at the earliest say within six weeks. (Om Prakash Shukla, J.) (Rajan Roy, J.) Order Date :- 26.3.2025 -Piyush- Digitally signed by :- PIYUSH YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- PIYUSH YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench