Court No. - 18 Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 756 of 2023 Applicant :- Vachaspati Mishra Opposite Party :- Rajendra Pandey, District Inspector Of Schools, Faizabad/ Ayodhya Counsel for Applicant :- Rakesh Pathak,Vijay Pathak Hon'ble Manish Kumar Nigam,J. 1. In compliance of order dated 22.03.2022, passed in contempt application earlier, the representation of the applicant has been decided on 09.05.2023, wherein the entitlement of the applicant has been accepted by the respondent authorities and has submitted the papers for budget approval. 2. It has been submitted by learned Standing Counsel that the order passed in writ petition as well as earlier contempt petition has been complied with as the order was only limited to the decision of the representation of the applicant. 3. In case, the applicant is aggrieved by the order on representation, he may initiate appropriate proceedings in accordance with law. 4. Since the order has been complied with by the respondent authorities on 09.05.2023 in compliance of order dated 22.03.2022 passed by writ court, no further orders are required to be passed in the contempt application. 5. Accordingly, the contempt application is consigned to records with liberty to the petitioner to avail the remedy as available to him for redressal of his grievance under law. 6. Notices, if any, are discharged. Order Date :- 23.1.2025 Ved Prakash (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- VED PRAKASH SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench