Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 12970 (ALL)

ANIL BHALLA AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU SECY. AND OTHERS

WRIC/5650/2012 · 2025-09-17

Anish Kumar Gupta, Mahesh Chandra Tripathi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 5650 of 2012 Court No. - 29 HON'BLE MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI, J. HON'BLE ANISH KUMAR GUPTA, J. 1. The matter was taken up in the revised list. However, none appeared on behalf of the petitioners to press this writ petition nor any adjournment slip has been moved. However, Shri Anuj Srivastava and Shri Ambrish Shukla, learned Addl. C.S.C. are present on behalf of the respondents. 2. In the absence of any effective representation, it appears that the cause of action has become stale and the petition has been rendered infructuous by efflux of time. 3. Accordingly the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous Interim order, if any, stands vacated 4. In case the petitioners fell that the matter still survives, liberty is granted to them to move an application for recalling of this order within six weeks from today. September 18, 2025 o.k. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Pramod Bhardwaj, Ram Surat Saroj Counsel for Respondent(s) : Anuj Srivastava, Ramendra Pratap Singh (Anish Kumar Gupta,J.) (Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.) Anil Bhalla And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru Secy. And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- OM KRISHNA CHOUDHARY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad