RAM RAJ RAWAT AND 5 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. SAMAJ KALYAN VIBHAG LKO. AND 4 OTHERS
WRIA/3185/2025 · 2025-03-25
Rajesh Singh Chauhan
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 129677 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 129677 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:17020 Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 3185 of 2025 Petitioner :- Ram Raj Rawat And 5 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Samaj Kalyan Vibhag Lko. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Siddharth Tripathi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.
1. Heard Shri Siddharth Tripathi, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Ran Vijay Singh, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents. 2. In view of the proposed order, notice to the opposite party no. 5 is hereby dispensed with. 3. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs:-
"I. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus thereby commanding the opposite parties to pay the complete arrears of salary to the petitioners. II. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the opposite party to pay 18% of penal interest from the date when the salary was stopped till payment of full arrears."
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is ready to prefer a fresh representation to the Competent Authority, therefore, he may be permitted to prefer a fresh representation to the opposite party No.2 i.e., Secretary Samaj Kalyan Vibhag, Sitting at Bapu Bhawan, Lucknow and a direction may be issued to him to consider and decide the said representation of the petitioner with expedition. 5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection if direction for disposal of the said representation is issued. 6.
Therefore, in view of the above, without entering into merits of the issue, I hereby dispose of this petition finally at the admission stage giving liberty to the petitioner to prefer a fresh representation to the opposite party No.2 i.e., Secretary Samaj Kalyan Vibhag, Sitting at Bapu Bhawan, Lucknow ventilating his grievance taking all pleas and grounds which are available with him enclosing therewith the copy of his earlier
representation, if any, which are necessary for disposal of the representation within a period of fifteen days from today and if such representation is preferred by the petitioner within the aforesaid stipulated time, the authority concerned shall consider and dispose of the same strictly, by speaking and reasoned order in accordance with law after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, if it is so required, with expedition preferably, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order and the decision thereof shall be intimated to the petitioner forthwith. 7. This writ petition is disposed of, in view of the aforesaid terms. Order Date :- 25.3.2025 Anurag Digitally signed by :- ANURAG SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench