( 2025:JHHC:17387 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.5233 of 2025 ------ Rahul Paswan, aged about 20 years, Son of Mahavir Paswan, Permanent Address-Village-Ichak, P.O. & P.S.-Gidhour, District- Chatra, Present Address-Chatra, Jitani More, P.O.-G.P.O., P.S.-Sadar, Dist.-Chatra, (Jharkhand). .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Lalan Kr. Singh, Advocate : Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Rajneesh Vardhan, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated- 01-07-2025 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with S.T. Case No.144 of 2025 arising out of Sadar (Bada Bazar O.P.) P.S. Case No.419 of 2024 registered for the offence punishable under Section 103(1), 3(5), 61(2)(a) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner in furtherance of common intention with the co-accused persons committed murder of Manjeet Yadav. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been implicated in this case only on the basis of suspicion that he along with the others conspired to kill the deceased. It is then submitted that the petitioner is not named in the FIR. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 24.01.2025 as is evident from para-01 of the instant bail application. It is then submitted that the co-accused, with similar allegations, has already been admitted to bail by this Court vide order dated 24.06.2025 passed in B.A. No.4971 of 2025. It is further submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner also undertakes to co- operate with the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge-VII, Hazaribagh in connection with S.T. Case No.144 of 2025 arising out of Sadar (Bada Bazar O.P.) P.S. Case No.419 of 2024 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the informant or witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Abhiraj/