Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 12966 (ALL)

AMAR SINGH AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU SECY. AND OTHERS

WRIC/5863/2012 · 2025-07-23

Mahesh Chandra Tripathi, Vinod Diwakar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:121526-DB Court No. - 29 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 5863 of 2012 Petitioner :- Amar Singh And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru Secy. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal Counsel for Respondent :- Anuj Srivastava,Ramendra Pratap Singh Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Hon'ble Vinod Diwakar,J. 1. List has been revised. No counsel has turned up to press the writ petition. 2. Shri Anuj Srivastava, who appears for the New Okhala Industrial Development Authority submits that a detailed counter affidavit had been filed wherein the authority had also taken the objection and the award was made in the year 2010. It is submitted that till date no such challenge to the award has been made, as such the acquisition has attained finality and at this stage, no relief can be extended. 3. In view of the aforesaid submission and the fact that the matter pertains to the year 2012, it appears that the cause of action has become stale and the writ petition has been rendered infructuous by efflux of time. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. Order Date :- 24.7.2025 A. V. Singh Digitally signed by :- AJAY VIKRAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad