Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 12964 (UTT)

MOHD AAZAD v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

C528/833/2024 · 2025-02-24

Alok Mahra

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:UHC:5982 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS C528/833/2024 Hon’ble Alok Mahra, J. No representation for the applicant. 2. Mr. Akshay Latwal, learned A.G.A. for the State. 3. Learned State Counsel submits that the present C-528 application was disposed of by this Court on 24.02.2025, requesting the court concerned to make an endeavour to decide Criminal Case No. 1150 of 2021, titled State vs. Vinay Pratap & Another, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of three months from the date of production of the certified copy of the said order. 4. A Time Extension Application (I.A. No. 2 of 2025) has been moved by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division)/Judicial Magistrate, Narendra Nagar, Tehri Garhwal, through the District Judge, stating that due to certain circumstances, the said case could not be concluded within the prescribed time. Accordingly, an extension of three months has been sought for concluding the trial. 5. For the reasons stated in the application, the Time Extension Application is allowed. 6. Consequently, further three months’ time is granted to the learned Civil Judge (J.D.)/Judicial Magistrate, Narendra Nagar, Tehri Garhwal to decide of Criminal Case No. 1150 of 2021 titled State vs. Vinay Partap & Another. [ (Alok Mahra, J.) 10.07.2025 Mamta 2025:UHC:5982