RAM CHARITTAR v. ADDL. COMMISSIONER (JUDICIAL), AYODHYA DIVISION, AYODHYA AND OTHERS
A227/1560/2025 · 2025-03-24
Saurabh Lavania
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 129602 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 129602 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:16580 Court No. - 7 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 1560 of 2025 Petitioner :- Ram Charittar Respondent :- Addl. Commissioner (Judicial), Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vivek Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mohan Singh Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Anurag Kumar Maurya, learned counsel for the State/ party No.1 as well as Shri Mohan Singh, learned Standing Counsel for the Gaon Sabha/opposite party No.3 and perused the record. In view of order proposed to be passed, issuance of notice to the private-respondents is hereby dispensed with. By means of this petition, the petitioner seeks following main relief :-
"Direct the opposite party no.1, i.e. Additional Commissioner (Judicial), Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya to decide the Appeal No.1415/2024, Computerized Case No.C202404000001415, Satya Narayan V/s Ram Charittar and others, under section 331 (3) of U.P. Z.A. & L.R. Act, 1950, relating to Village-Kaithijalalpur, Pargana-Aldemau, Tehsil-Kadipur, District-Sultanpur expeditiously within a period as fixed by this Hon'ble court, in the interest of justice." It is stated that as per para 458(2) of U.P. Revenue Court Manual, an appeal or revision should preferably be decided within a period of six months. However, in the instant case, the revision is pending since June, 2024 and on account of pendency of the same, the petitioner is suffering great hardship. In these circumstances, indulgence of this Court is required in the matter. The prayer is to expedite the proceedings of pending case. Learned State counsel submits that he has no objection in case an expedite order is passed. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is of the view that no fruitful purpose will be served in keeping this petition pending. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the opposite party no.1/ Additional Commissioner (Judicial), Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya to decide the Appeal No.1415/2024 (Computerized Case No.C202404000001415) "Satya Narayan V/s Ram Charittar and others" expeditiously after affording full opportunity of hearing to the parties to the litigation and without granting unnecessary adjournment to either party preferably within a period of six months from the next date fixed in the case, if there is no other legal impediment in this regard.
It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of either party on merits and the Authority concerned shall be free to decide the matter strictly in accordance with law. With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 24.3.2025/ML Digitally signed by :- MUNNA LAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench