APHC010154152018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION No. 6803 of 2018 Between: 1. KAMISETTI SATISH BABU,, S/O.SIVA NAGESWARARAO AGED 35 YEARS, OCC UN-EMPLOYEE, R/O.MOPIDEVI VILLAGE AND MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. UNION OF INDIA, UNION OF INDIA, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS, NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI. 2. DIRECTOR GENERAL BORDER SECURITY FORCE, C.G.O. COMPLEX, LODHI ROAD, NEW DELHI. 3. INSPECTOR GENERAL BORDER SECURITY FORCE, HEAD QUEARTERS, SOUTH BENGAL FRONTIER, 2-B LORDS SINHA, ROAD, KOLKATTA-700071 4. DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL BORDER SECURITY FORCE, SEEMANAGAR, KRISHNANAGAR POST, NADIA DISTRICT, WEST BENGAL. 5. COMMANDANT, 113 BATTALION, SEEMANAGAR, MEHTAPUR, NADIA DISTRICT, WEST BENGAL. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the dismissal order dated 24.02.2014 and confirmation of the dismissal order dated 18.12.2015 passed by the respondents 2 and 5 respectively without taking into the evansage of the statutory appeal dated 9-06-2015 submitted by the petitioner, as illegal, irregular, irrational against the principles of natural justice, contrary to the settled principles of service jurisprudence and offends Articles 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to re-intestate the petitioner into service of constable (General Duty) after setting aside the order dated 22.02.2014 and 18.12.2015 with all consequential benefits followed by backwages in favour of the petitioner and pass.... 2 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. DOYIJODE SREENIVASA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. PASALA PONNA RAO (SC FOR CENT GOVT.) The Court made the following: ORDER: The instant Writ Petition is filed by the Petitioner seeking indulgence of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “.... to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the dismissal order dated 24.02.2014 and confirmation of the dismissal order dated 18.12.2015 passed by the respondents 2 and 5 respectively without taking into the evansage of the statutory appeal dated 9.06.2015 submitted by the petitioner as illegal, irregular, irrational against the principles of natural justice, contrary to the settled principles of service jurisprudence and offends Articles 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently, direct the respondents to re- intestate the petitioner into service of constable General Duty after setting aside the order dated 22.02.2014 and 18.12.2015 with all consequential benefits followed by backwages in favour of the petitioner and pass.....” 2. The earlier Docket Proceedings would show that none represented for the Petitioner and the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption “For Dismissal”. 3. Despite the matter being listed under the caption “For dismissal”, none represented for the Petitioner today. 4. Learned Standing Counsel for Central Government appearing for respondents is in attendance. 5. In that view, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Writ Petition No. 6803 of 2018 25.06.2025 Mjl /*