SHESHMANI MISHRA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER
BAILC/43/2025 · 2025-04-25
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 129583 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 129583 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:23838 Court No. - 6 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL CANCELLATION APPLICATION No. - 43 of 2025 Applicant :- Sheshmani Mishra Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Ajeet Kumar Singh,Raghvendra Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Dharm Raj Mishra, learned counsel for the accused respondent no. 2 and perused the record.
2. The bail cancellation application has been filed seeking cancellation of bail granted to the accused
13.12.2021.
3. The contention of the counsel for the applicant is that the accused after being enlarged on bail is not cooperating with the trial as is evident from the order sheet of the trial Court. It is further argued that through an application under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C., an FIR was also got lodged against the accused after the grant of bail.
4. Considering the fact that the Court while granting the bail had observed that the allegations against the accused were prima facie only under Section 120B IPC and there being no allegation even in the application under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. i.e. attack was made on the applicant in respect of the pending case.
5. The counsel for the accused states that he would cooperate with the trial.
6. In view of the said, no good ground for cancellation of bail is made out. The bail cancellation application is accordingly rejected. Order Date :- 25.4.2025 Arun Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench