ON THE DEATH OF RAMAVATAR JALAN THE RESONDENT HIS LEGAL HEIR CHIRAG JALAN v. PRATAP KUMAR GOGOI
I.A.(Crl.)/626/2025 · 2025-08-06
Sanjeev Kumar Sharma
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 12958 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 12958 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010110042025
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/626/2025 ON THE DEATH OF RAMAVATAR JALAN THE RESONDENT HIS LEGAL HEIR CHIRAG JALAN S/O RAVAMATAR JALAN R/O NEHA APARTMENT BLOCK 7A FLAT NO 7903, SATI JAYMATI ROAD, ATHAGAON, GUWAHATI KAMRUP M ASSAM VERSUS PRATAP KUMAR GOGOI PROPRIETOR OF SURAJEET ENTERPRISE NEAR ULTRA CARE LABORATORY, JAYANTI APARTMENT, 1ST FLOOR BLOCK B, ASHOK PATH, SURVEY, BELTOLA GUWAHATI 781028 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. K BHATTACHARJEE, ABBASH U AHMED Advocate for the Respondent : ,
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR SHARMA ORDER Date : 07-08-2025 Heard Mr. K. Bhattacharjee, learned counsel appearing for the applicant as well as Mr. N.K. Kalita, learned counsel appearing for the respondent.
2. This is an application under Section 279 of BNSS (corresponding Section 256 of the Code of Criminal Procedure) for substitution of Late Ramavatar Jalan, proprietor of Assam Supply Syndicate
Page No.# 2/2 with his legal heir.
3. M/S Dutta Electricals issued a cheque in favour of Late Ramavatar Jalan. The cheque bounced and therefore, Ramavatar Jalan filed a complaint case against M/S Dutta Electricals. The trial court convicted Sri Biplab Dutta, the proprietor of M/S Dutta Electricals. After the judgment, some amount of money was paid to Ramavatar Jalan and some amount of money is yet to be paid.
4. In the meantime, Ramavatar Jalan died and therefore, his legal heir needs to be impleaded in the connected revision petition.
5. After hearing the learned counsels of both sides, the prayer of the applicant is allowed. The legal heir of Ramavatar Jalan namely, Sri Chirag Jalan shall be impleaded in his place in the connected petition.
6. Accordingly, the Registry shall make the necessary correction in the cause title of the petition.
7. With the aforesaid direction, the interlocutory application stands disposed of
JUDGE Comparing Assistant