Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 129576 (MAD)

Ramesh @ Ramesh Prabha v. The State of Tamil Nadu

CRL OP(MD)/5597/2025 · 2025-04-02

P Dhanabal

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Crl.O.P(MD)No.5597 of 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 02.04.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P. DHANABAL Crl.O.P(MD)No.5597 of 2025 1. Ramesh @ Ramesh Prabha 2. Ayyavu @ Karuppasamy 3. Marimuthu 4. Manoj ... Petitioners Vs 1. The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep by the Inspector of Police, Aruppukottai Taluk Police Station, Virudhunagar District. Crime No. 294/2024. 2. Vishnuprabha ... Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original petitions have been filed under Section 528 of BNSS to call for the records pertaining to Crime No.294/2024 dt. 27.12.2024 on the file of the Aruppukottai Taluk Police station, Virudhunagar District and quash the same. 1/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P(MD)No.5597 of 2025 For Petitioners : Mr.J.Mohammed Ibrahim For R1 : Mr.M.M.Vaikkam Karunanithi Government Advocate (Crl.Side) For R2 : Mr.K.Yasar Arafath O R D E R This petition has been filed by the petitioners to call for the records pertaining to the First Information Report in Crime No.294 of 2024 dated 27.12.2024 on the file of the first respondent police, for the offences under Sections 296(b), 329(1), 127(2) and 75 of BNS and Section 4 of TNPHW Act and quash the same. 2. When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsels on both sides represented that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties and to that effect, they have entered into a compromise and the same was filed before this Court. 3. The defacto-complainant and all the accused are present and this Court enquired about the terms of compromise. The defacto-complainant 2/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P(MD)No.5597 of 2025 represented that they entered into a compromise as they are close relatives and he has no objection to quash the FIR. A compromise memo, dated 17.03.2025 signed by the parties and their respective counsel, is also filed before this Court. 4. This Court has perused the terms of the compromise memo. 5. Considering the nature of the offences and the relationship between the parties and they have also entered into a compromise, it is appropriate to allow this petition. 6. Recording the said compromise memo, this petition is allowed and the First Information Report in Crime No.294 of 2024 dated 27.12.2024 on the file of the first respondent police is quashed. 02.04.2025 Internet :Yes Index :Yes/No NCC :Yes/No LR 3/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P(MD)No.5597 of 2025 To 1. The State of Tamilnadu, Rep by the Inspector of Police, Aruppukottai Taluk Police Station, Virudhunagar District. Crime No.18 of 2025. 2.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. 4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P(MD)No.5597 of 2025 P. DHANABAL, J. LR Crl.O.P(MD)No.5597 of 2025 02.04.2025 5/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis