SMT. LALITA JAIN W/O SHRI HUKMI CHAND JAIN v. SHRI NARESH PAL GANGWAR
CCP/283/2025 · 2025-09-04
Ganesh Ram Meena
Contempt Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 12957 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 12957 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:35518] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 283/2025 IN S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.8517/2002 Smt. Lalita Jain W/o Shri Hukmi Chand Jain, Aged About 71 Years, R/o 262, Mahavir Nagar, Tonk Road, Jaipur ----Petitioner Versus
1. Shri Naresh Pal Gangwar, Principal Secretary To The Government,
Secondary
Education
Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur
2. Shri Nathmal Didel, Director, Secondary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner
3. Shri Ratan Singh Yadav, District Education Officer, Secondary Education, Jaipur District (First), Shiksha Sankul, Jawahar Lal Nehru Marg, Jaipur
4. Shri Mahesh Chand Gupta, District Education Officer, Secondary Education, Jaipur District (Second), Shiksha Sankul, Jawahar Lal Nehru Marg, Jaipur
5. Smt. Manju Sharma, Principal, Government Girls Senior Secondary School, Sanganer, District Jaipur
6. Smt. Shashi Mudgal, Principal, Government Girls Senior Secondary School, Jobner, District Jaipur
7. The State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary To The Government, Secondary Education Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur ----Respondents/Contemnors For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Amit K. Dikshit for Mr. Prahlad Singh For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manoj Sharma, AAG assisted by Mr. Rohan Gupta Mr. S.M. Sharma HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 04/09/2025
[2025:RJ-JP:35518] (2 of 2) [CCP-283/2025] Learned Additional Advocate General appearing for the respondents/contemnors submits that the due payment has already been sanctioned and disbursed to to the petitioner by way of depositing the amount in his bank account. In view of the statement made by learned Additional Advocate General appearing for the respondents/contemnors, the present contempt petition is disposed of as the respondents/contemnors have complied with the orders of the Court. In case the petitioner has any grievance, he may make an appropriate application for revival of this contempt petition.
(GANESH RAM MEENA),J ARTI SHARMA /23