Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 12957 (HP)

PRANSHU KUMAR v. THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS

CWP/7194/2025 · 2025-05-27

Sandeep Sharma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 7194 of 2025 Date of Decision: 27.05.2025 _______________________________________________________ Pranshu Kumar …….Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & others … Respondents ______________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Ganesh Barowalia, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Rajan Kahol, Mr. Vishal Panwar and Mr. B.C.Verma, Additional Advocate Generals and Mr. Ravi Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General, for the respondents/State. Mr. Ajay Kumar Chauhan, Advocate for respondent Nos. 3 and 4. Mr. Sandeep K. Pandey, Advocate, for respondent Nos. 5 and 6. _______________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge(oral): While placing on record communication dated 15.05.2025, issued under the signatures of Controller of Examinations-cum- Member Secretary, Prospectus Review Committee & Common/Centralized Counselling Committee (MBBS/ BDS), Mr. Sandeep K. Pandey, learned counsel representing the respondent-Atal Medical Research University, 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 Himachal Pradesh, states that cancellation order issued by afore authority, thereby withdrawing the admission of the petitioner, has been withdrawn and he has been provisionally allowed to continue his course based on the bonafide Himachali Certificate of his mother named as Smt. Mamta D/o Joginder Singh, subject to the outcome of the matter pending in this Court or verification of his mother’s Bonafide Himachali Certificate. 2. In view of the above, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the present petition and accordingly same is disposed of as having rendered infructuous. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (Sandeep Sharma), Judge May 27, 2025 (shankar)