PRADEEP KUMAR @ PRADEEP KUMAR TIWARI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. SECONDARY EDUCATION LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIA/3149/2025 · 2025-03-26
Rajesh Singh Chauhan
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 129563 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 129563 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:17374 Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 3149 of 2025 Petitioner :- Pradeep Kumar @ Pradeep Kumar Tiwari Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Secondary Education Lko. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Mohd. Waris Farooqui,Manoj Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.
1. Heard Mohd. Waris Farooqui, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Paawan Awasthi, learned counsel for opposite parties no.1, 2 & 3.
2. In view of the proposed order, notice to opposite party no.4 is hereby dispensed with.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed supplementary affidavit, the same is taken on record.
4. By means of this petition, the petitioner has prayed following main reliefs:-
"i. issue a writ, order or direction, in the nature of mandamus, commanding the opp-parties, more particularly the opp-party no.3, to make the payment of salary on the post of Assistant Teacher (Sanskrit) to the petitioner on each and every month regularly, including the arrears with effect from 30.5.2003. ii. issue a writ, order or direction, in the nature of further mandamus, commanding the opp-parties, not to interfere in the peaceful functioning of the petitioner on the post of Assistant Teacher (Sanskrit) in the Institution of the opp-party no.4."
5. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that for redressal of the aforesaid grievance, the petitioner has preferred representation to the competent authority, but to no avail.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has also submitted that the petitioner may be permitted to prefer a fresh representation before opposite party no.3 and this Court may direct opposite party no.3 to pass appropriate order strictly in accordance with law.
6. Learned counsel for the opposite parties has no objection if direction for disposal of the representation is issued.
7. Therefore, without entering into merits of the issue, the petitioner is permitted to prefer a fresh representation to opposite party no.3 i.e. District Inspector of Schools, Faizabad, now District Ayodhya taking all pleas and grounds, which are necessary for disposal of the representation and also enclosing the earlier representation, if any, alongwith certified copy of this order within a period of two weeks from today. If such representation is preferred by the petitioner within the aforesaid stipulated time, the authority concerned shall consider and dispose of the aforesaid representation of the petitioner by speaking and reasoned order, strictly in accordance with law, with expedition, say within a period of three months from the date of receipt of the representation and thereafter communicate the decision thereof to the petitioner forthwith.
8. With the aforesaid direction, the writ petition is disposed of finally. [Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.]
Order Date :- 26.3.2025 RBS/- Digitally signed by :- RAM BIR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench