Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 129536 (MAD)

PALANIVELRAJAN.S v. THE PRL. SECRETARY TO GOVT OF TAMILNADU

WP(MD)/11011/2021 · 2025-10-17

Abdul Quddhose

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P.(MD) Nos.11011 & 11015 of 2021 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 17.10.2025 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE W.P.(MD) Nos.11011 & 11015 of 2021 and W.M.P.(MD) Nos.8638, 8639, 8643 & 8644 of 2021 W.P.(MD) No.11011 of 2021: S.Palanivelrajan ... Petitioner -vs- 1.The Principal Secretary to Govt. of Tamilnadu Agricultural (AAI) Department St.George Fort, Secretariat Chennai 2.The Director of Horticulture and Plantation Crops Chepauk, Chennai-600 005 3.The Controller of Examination Tamilnadu Public Service Commission Frazer Bridge Road, V.O.C.Nagar Park Town, Chennai ... Respondents ____________ p. 2 W.P.(MD) Nos.11011 & 11015 of 2021 PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of certiorari to call for the records pertaining to the impugned notification No.3/2021 in advertisement No.578 dated 05.02.2021 passed by the 3rd respondent and quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Muniyandi For Respondents : Mr.C.Satheesh Government Advocate for R1 & R2 Mr.J.Anandkumar Standing Counsel for R3 W.P.(MD) No.11015 of 2021: M.G.Narayanan ... Petitioner -vs- 1.The Principal Secretary to Govt. of Tamilnadu Agricultural (AAI) Department St.George Fort, Secretariat Chennai 2.The Director of Horticulture and Plantation Crops Chepauk, Chennai-600 005 3.The Controller of Examination Tamilnadu Public Service Commission Frazer Bridge Road, V.O.C.Nagar Park Town, Chennai ... Respondents ____________ p. 3 W.P.(MD) Nos.11011 & 11015 of 2021 PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of certiorari to call for the records pertaining to the impugned notification No.3/2021 in advertisement No.578 dated 05.02.2021 passed by the 3rd respondent and quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Muniyandi For Respondents : Mr.C.Satheesh Government Advocate for R1 & R2 Mr.J.Anandkumar Standing Counsel for 3rd Respondent C O M M O N O R D E R Learned counsel for the respective petitioners reports no instruction in both writ petitions. He has also made endorsements to that effect in the court bundles. 2. These writ petitions are of the year 2021 and they are listed today under the caption “for dismissal”. It can now be inferred that the respective petitioners are not interested in prosecuting these writ petitions. ____________ p. 4 W.P.(MD) Nos.11011 & 11015 of 2021 3. Accordingly, these writ petitions are dismissed for non- prosecution. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. 17.10.2025 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No krk To: 1.The Principal Secretary to Govt. of Tamilnadu, Agricultural (AAI) Department, St.George Fort, Secretariat, Chennai, 2.The Director of Horticulture and Plantation Crops, Chepauk, Chennai-600 005. ____________ p. 5 W.P.(MD) Nos.11011 & 11015 of 2021 ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J. krk W.P.(MD) Nos.11011 & 11015 of 2021 and W.M.P.(MD) Nos.8638, 8639, 8643 & 8644 of 2021 17.10.2025 ____________