Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 129535 (ALL)

SHITLA PRASAD @ SHITLA PRASAD MISHRA v. APAR AYUKT (NAYAYIK) 4TH, AYODHYA MANDAL, AYODHYA AND 5 OTHERS

A227/1599/2025 · 2025-03-25

Saurabh Lavania

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:16973 Court No. - 7 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 1599 of 2025 Petitioner :- Shitla Prasad @ Shitla Prasad Mishra Respondent :- Apar Ayukt (Nayayik) 4th, Ayodhya Mandal, Ayodhya And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Prabhakar Nath Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mohan Singh Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J. Heard. In view of order proposed to be passed, issuance of notice to the private-respondent(s) is hereby dispensed with. The present petition has been filed for the following main relief:- "i. Issue an order or direction to the Apar Ayukt (Nayayik) 4th Ayodhya Mandal- Ayodhya for i.e. opposite party No.1 to decide the case bearing appeal no. 71/2024 and Computerized Case No. C202404000000071 (Pradhuman Kumar Mishra others. Vs. Shitla Prasad & others) U/s 207 U.P. Revenue Code 2006, pending before him, within stipulated time. Which is containing as Annexure no.1 to this petition." Considering the facts as stated, particularly the period of pendency of the appeal, which appears to be pending since January 2024 as also taking note of statutory provisions including para 458(2) of U.P. Revenue Court Manual, the present petition is disposed of with direction to opposite party no.1/Apar Ayukt (Nayayik) 4th Ayodhya Mandal- Ayodhya , to consider and decide the pending appeal in issue i.e. Appeal No. 71/2024 and Computerized Case No. C202404000000071 (Pradhuman Kumar Mishra others. Vs. Shitla Prasad & others), most expeditiously, after affording full opportunity of hearing to the parties, but without granting any unnecessary adjournment, preferably within a period of six months from the next date fixed before it, if there is no other legal impediment in this regard. It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of either party on merits and the Authority concerned shall be free to decide the matter strictly in accordance with law. With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 25.3.2025 Jyoti/- Digitally signed by :- JYOTI RAJWANI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench