NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 1706 of 2017 1 - Pradeep Kumar Sana S/o Late Shri Dhirendra Sana, Aged About 42 Years Occupation Constable, R/o Subhash Nagar, Ward No. 02, Sai Mandir Road, Police Station Gandhi Nagar, Ambikapur, Tahsil Ambikapur, District Surajpur Chhattisgarh., Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Department Of Home Police , Mahanadi Mantralaya, Police Station And Post Rakhi, New Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh., Chhattisgarh 2 - Director General Of Police D. G. P. , Police Headquarters P H Q , Near Mahanadi Mantralaya, Police Station And Post Rakhi, New Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Inspector General Of Police I. G. P. , Office Of Inspector General Of Police I. G. P. , Bangali Chowk, Ambikapur, District Surguja Chhattisgarh., District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh 4 - Superintendent Of Police S. P. , Office Of Superintendent Of Police, Balrampur, District Balrampur Chhattisgarh., District : Balrampur, Chhattisgarh 5 - Commandant, 10th Battalion, Silphili, Ambikapur, District Surguja Chhattisgarh., District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner : Mr.Abhishek Pandey, Advocate For State : Ms. Shailja Shukla, Dy. G.A. Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 18.07.2025 1. Mr.Pandey, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner may be permitted to make a fresh representation before the respondent authorities and in turn, the authority concerned may be directed to decide it expeditiously in REKHA SINGH Digitally signed by REKHA SINGH -2- accordance with law. 2. On the other hand, learned counsel appearing for the State would oppose the submissions made by Mr. Pandey. 3. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties and perused the documents placed on record. 4. Taking into consideration the limited prayer made by Mr. Pandey, this petition at this juncture is disposed of reserving liberty in favour of the petitioner to make a fresh representation before respondent No.3 & 4 and in turn, the authority concerned is directed to decide it expeditiously. 5. With the aforesaid observation(s)/direction(s), the present petition is disposed of. 6. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge Rekha