PREM KUMAR AND ANOTHER v. ADDL. COMMISSIONER (ADMINISTRATION), AYODHYA MANDAL, AYODHYA AND OTHERS
A227/1573/2025 · 2025-03-25
Saurabh Lavania
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 129523 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 129523 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:16807 Court No. - 7 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 1573 of 2025 Petitioner :- Prem Kumar And Another Respondent :- Addl. Commissioner (Administration), Ayodhya Mandal, Ayodhya And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Pradeep Kumar,Adarsh Tripathi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mohan Singh Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J. Sri Girish Chandra Verma, learned Advocate has filed his Vakalatnama on behalf of opposite party no.6, which is taken on record. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner, Sri Yogesh Awasthi, learned State Counsel, Sri Mohan Singh, learned Counsel for the Gaon Sabha and perused the records. In view of order proposed to be passed, issuance of notice to the private-respondent(s) is hereby dispensed with. The present petition has been filed for the following main relief:-
"(i) Issue pass an order or directions to the opposite party no.-1 to expeditiously decide the application dated 27.02.2025 filed in Revision No. 148/2025 under section 210 of Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006 Prem Kumar & another versus Gyanwati Verma & Others pending before the Court of Additional Commissioner (Administration), Ayodhya Mandal, Ayodhya i.e. respondent no.-1 expeditiously and refrain the opposite party no. 6 to 10 from creating hindrance in the peaceful possession of the property Others pending before the Court of Additional Commissioner (Administration), Ayodhya Mandal, Ayodhya i.e. respondent no.-1 expeditiously and refrain the opposite party no. 6 to 10 from creating hindrance the peaceful possession of the property situated at Khata No. 297, Gata No. 705 area 1.215 Hectare situated at Vill-Sahsipur, Pargana-Paschimi Rath, Tehsil-Bikapur, District-Ayodhya, so that the standing crops may be prevented from damage." Considered the facts of the case as also that there is no quarrel between the parties, if this petition is disposed of with direction to the opposite party no.1/Additional Commissioner (Administration), Ayodhya Mandal, Ayodhya (in short 'authority concerned'), to consider and dispose of the application dated 13.01.2025 seeking interim protection, after giving full opportunity of hearing to the parties, within time specified. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of with direction to authority concerned to consider and dispose of the application in issue, most expeditiously, after affording full opportunity of hearing to the parties, but without granting any unnecessary adjournment, preferably within a period of 30 days from the date of production of a certified copy of this
order. It is also expected from the authority concerned to decide the revision of the petitioner within time specified under para 458(2) of U.P. Revenue Court Manual. It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of either party on merits and the Authority concerned shall be free to decide the matter strictly in accordance with law. With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of.
Order Date :- 25.3.2025 Jyoti/- Digitally signed by :- JYOTI RAJWANI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench