Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 12951 (KAR)

JAGADEESH R v. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR

WP/444/2025 · 2025-03-21

R Nataraj

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:11857 WP No. 444 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R. NATARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 444 OF 2025 (S-RES) BETWEEN: 1. JAGADEESH R S/O. RAJANNA AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS OCC - JUNIOR POWER LINE MEN WEST SECTION VINAYAK NAGAR TUMAKURU CITY DIVISION-1 TUMAKURU - 572 101 2. JAGADEESH K.V. S/O. VENKATESH AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS OCC - JUNIOR POWER LINE MEN WEST SECTION VINAYAK NAGAR TUMAKURU CITY DIVISION-1 TUMAKURU - 572 101 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. NATARAJ G., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR KPTCL, K.R. CIRCLE BENGALURU - 560 001 2. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER BESCOM, O & M SECTION HORAPETE Digitally signed by SUMA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:11857 WP No. 444 of 2025 TUMAKURU DIVISION - 1 TUMAKURU - 572 101 3. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER BESCOM, HORAPETE TUMAKURU CITY DIVISION-1 TUMAKURU - 572 101 4. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER BESCOM, VINAYAK NAGAR TUMAKURU CITY DIVISION-1 TUMAKURU - 572 101 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. A. CHANDRACHUD, ADVOCATE FOR R2 TO R4) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 19.12.2024 BEING PASSED BY THE R-2 VIDE ORDER NO. KANIEM(V)/LEAA/SALEAA/HISA(C)/2024- 25/19357-62 VIDE ANNX-U IN SO FAR AS THE P-1 AND 2 ARE CONCERNED. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R. NATARAJ - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:11857 WP No. 444 of 2025 ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has challenged an order of suspending him from service and the respondents have revoked the order of suspension. Therefore, the writ petition does not survive for consideration. In view of the aforesaid submission, the petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (R. NATARAJ) JUDGE JS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 33