SANDEEP KUMAR v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND THROUGH SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOME, DEHRADUN
C482/2214/2022 · 2025-05-16
Pankaj Purohit
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 12949 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 12949 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS
C482 No.2214 of 2022 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J.
Mr. Paritosh Dalakoti, learned counsel for the applicants (through V.C.).
2. Mr. S.C. Dumka, learned AGA with Ms. Sweta Badola Dobhal, learned Brief Holder for the State.
3. None present for respondent no.2.
4.
Learned counsel for the applicants made a statement at bar that present C482 application has rendered infructuous as both the applicants have been acquitted during trial in Sessions Trial No.35 of 2022, vide judgment and order dated 29.07.2024, passed by learned 1st Additional District and Sessions Judge, Haldwani, District Nainital.
5. In view of the aforesaid statement made by
learned counsel for the applicants, the present C482 application is dismissed as infructuous.
(Pankaj Purohit, J.)
16.05.2025 AK