KATREDDY RAMACHANDRA RAO v. THOTA RAGNA RAO AND ANOTHERS
CRLRC/1313/2011 · 2025-07-10
Y Lakshmana Rao
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 12948 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 12948 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010154232011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATU FRIDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1313 OF 2011 Revision filed under Section 397 & 401 of Cr.P.C., aggrieved by the
Judgment dated: 30-03-2011 passed in Crl.A.No. 164/2010 on the file of the III Additional Sessions Judge (Fast Track Court) Bhimavaram, West Godavari District and preferred against Judgment dated; 21-06-2010 passed in 0,0 No.223 of 2008 on the file of the Principal Junior Civil Judge-cum-Judicial I Class Magistrate Bhimavaram, West Godavari District. Between: Katreddy Ramachandra Rao, S/o Bhaskara Rao, aged about 47 Occ; Cultivation, R/o Bhimavaram, West Godavari District. years, ...Petitioner/Complainant AND
1. Thota Ragna Rao, S/o Subbaiah, aged about 59 years, R/o Kaikaluru Village & mandal, West Godovari District. ...Respondent/Accused
2. The State of A.P., Rep by its Public prosecutor. High Court AP.,Hyderabad. of ...Respondent/Complainant
Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri K V L Narasimha Rao Counsel for the Respondent No.1: Sri Narasimha Rao Gudiseva Counsel for the Respondent No.2: Public Prosecutor The Court made the following order:
APHC010154232011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Oi iginal Jurisdiction) [3521] FRIDAY,THE ELEVENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINALREVISIONCASE NO: 1313/2011 Between: KATREDDY RAMACHANDRA RAO CULTIVATION, R/0 BHIMAVARAM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER S/0 BHASKARA RAO AND 1.THOTA RAGNA RAO AND ANOTHERS, S/0 SUBBAIAH R/0 KAIKALURU VILLAGE & MANDAL, WEST GODOVARI DISTRICT.
2.THE STATE OF AP REP BYITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF AP.,HYDERABAD. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner:
KVL NARASIMHA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.NARASIMHA RAO GUDISEVA
2. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
The Court made the following:
ORDER: The
learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the Accused/unofficial respondent expired. Hence, this Criminal Revision Case may be dismissed as abated.
2. In view of the death of the Accused/unofficial respondent, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as abated. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel. Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed.
SDI- V DIWAKAR DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To,
1. The III Additional Sessions Judge (Fast Track Court): Bhimavaram, West Godavari District.
2. The Principal Civil Judge (Junior Division)-cum-Judicial I Class Magistrate Bhimavaram, West Godavari District.
3. One CC to Sri K V L Narasimha Rao Advocate [OPUC]
4. One CC to Sri Narasimha Rao Gudiseva Advocate [OPUC]
5. Two CC's to The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati [OUT]
6. The Section Officer, Criminal Section, High Court of Andhra Pradesh.
7. Two CD Copies OL
z f high court DATED; 11/07/2025
ORDER CRLRC No. 1313 of 2011 AND«^ 5 2 3 SEP 2025 m: Currant section ^ 9 4£?«PATCV«S dismissing the CRLRC AS ABATED