APHC010154162025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3369] THURSDAY ,THE THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 3310/2025 Between: Gemmela Srinu ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT Counsel for the Petitioner/accused: 1. P NAGENDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent/complainant: 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following: ORDER:- This Criminal Petition, under Sections 480 and 483 of the BNSS, has been filed by the petitioner/A2, seeking regular bail, in Crime No.2 of 2025 of Annavaram Police Station, Alluri Sitharama Raju District. 2. A case has been registered against the petitioner herein and others for the offences punishable under Section 20(b)(ii)(C), 25 r/w 8(c) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (for short ‘the NDPS Act’). 2 3. The brief facts of the case are that on 05.02.2025 on receipt of credible information, the SI of police along with staff and mediators rushed to Ramaraopalem Junction, Lothugedda Panchayat, Chintapalli Mandal, Alluri Sitharamaraju District and caught hold the accused in the presence of mediators and seized 3 kgs of liquid ganja in a gunny bag. 4. Heard. Perused the record. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner/A2 contends that the petitioner is arrested on 03.03.2025 and since he has been languishing in jail and prays to allow the petition. 6. Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor submits that 3 kgs of liquid ganja (hash oil) is very huge monstrous and gargantuan commercial quantity and investigation is not completed and some more witnesses are to be examined and prays to dismiss the criminal petition. 7. After careful observation of the material on record and submissions made on behalf of both sides, as the contraband involved in this crime is huge quantity i.e. 3 kgs of liquid ganja (hash oil) and as the petitioner is remanded to judicial custody on 03.03.2025 itself and the allegations made against the 3 petitioner is grave in nature, this Court is not inclined to consider the criminal petition at this stage. 8. In the result, the Criminal Petition is dismissed. _____________________ T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO , J Date.03.04.2025. S D P 4 122 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO Criminal Petition No.3310 of 2025 Dated:04.04.2025 S D P