Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (116) CWP-29877-2025 Date of decision:- 10.12.2025 VED PARKASH .... Petitioner Versus LD PRESIDING OFFICER AND OTHERS ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUVIR SEHGAL Present:- Mr. Namit Khurana, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Aditya Kochar, Advocate for respondent No.4. ***** SUVIR SEHGAL, J. (ORAL)
1. Counsel for the petitioner states that, as the proceedings which were pending before the Permanent Lok Adalat have been withdrawn, petition has become infructuous.
2. Dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. 10.12.2025 (SUVIR SEHGAL) Kusum
JUDGE Whether Speaking/Reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No KUSUM 2025.12.11 18:38 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document PHHC Chandigarh