( 2025:JHHC:17951 ) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 3529 of 2025 ------ 1. Raj Gope, aged about 22 years. 2. Rajan Gope, aged about 25 years. (Both are sons of Ramesh Gope) 3. Ramesh Gope, aged about 50 years, S/O Sambhu Gope. (All are resident of Bichali Hotel, Deoli, PO & PS – Govindpur, District – Dhanbad). … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Opposite Party ------ CORAM: SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sanjay Prasad, Advocate For the State : Ms. Lily Sahay, APP ----- 04/ 04th July 2025 1. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. 2. This anticipatory bail application under Section 482 and 484 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 has been preferred by the petitioners apprehending their arrest for offences registered under Sections 126 (2), 115 (2), 109 (1), 303 (2), 3 (5) of the B.N.S., in connection with Govindpur P.S. Case No. 31 of 2025, pending in the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate – 1st Class, Dhanbad. 3. The prosecution case is that these petitioners have assaulted the son of the informant with some other members and damaged articles of the hotel. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that since the informant was selling liquor illegally in the hotel, some unknown persons after consuming liquor has committed the offence. 5. After hearing the hearing the learned counsel for the parties and going through the records, I find that on the previous day of the occurrence, these petitioners were there and they were quarrelling and they were sent back. Again on the next day, they came and assaulted the informant, his son and also damaged the roadside hotel of the informant. ( 2025:JHHC:17951 ) 2 6. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State submits that the injuries are grievous in nature. 7. Considering the specific allegation against these petitioners, I am of the opinion that it is not a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail. 8. Petitioner is directed to appear before the concerned Court. If the petitioner appears, his case will be considered on its own merit without being prejudice by this order. 9. Accordingly, this Anticipatory Bail Application stands dismissed. (ANANDA SEN, J.) Aditi