Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 12942 (UTT)

ANIL KUMAR SINGH v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

BA2/339/2023 · 2025-08-02

Alok Mahra

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:UHC:6813 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS BA2/339/2023 Hon’ble Alok Mahra, J. Mr. Amit Satyawali proxy counsel for Mr. Vikas Anand, learned counsel for the applicant. 2. Mr. G.S. Sandhu, learned Additional Advocate General along with Mr. Vipul Painuali, learned A.G.A. and Mr. Vijay Khanduri, Brief Holder for the State. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant would submit at Bar that the present bail application has become infructuous, as the trial has already concluded and the applicant has been convicted by the learned trial court. 4. In view of the above, the second bail application stands dismissed as infructuous. (Alok Mahra, J.) 02.08.2025 Mamta 2025:UHC:6813