GAUTAM KAHAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO AND ANOTHER
CRLA/911/2025 · 2025-03-24
Rajnish Kumar
Criminal Appealbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 129409 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 129409 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:16563 Court No. - 11 Case :- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 911 of 2025 Appellant :- Gautam Kahar Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko And Another Counsel for Appellant :- Aniket Srivastav,Satish Chandra Kashish Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Rajnish Kumar,J. On an objection raised by Sri S.P. Tiwari, learned AGA that the respondent no.2 could not have been impleaded by name,
learned counsel for the appellant submits that this appeal may be dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file fresh after proper impleadment. Dismissed as not pressed with liberty as aforesaid. As prayed by learned counsel for the appellant, office is
directed to return the certified copy/copies annexed with this appeal to learned counsel for the appellant after keeping the photocopy of the same on record in accordance with law.
Order Date :- 24.3.2025 Akanksha Sri/- Digitally signed by :- AKANKSHA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench