Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 129407 (ALL)

RAMSARAN v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. DISTRICT MAGISTRATE / COLLECTOR, PRATAPGARH AND OTHERS

WRIC/2799/2025 · 2025-04-10

Saurabh Lavania

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:20343 Court No. - 7 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 2799 of 2025 Petitioner :- Ramsaran Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. District Magistrate / Collector, Pratapgarh And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ram Singh,Priyanshi Vishwakarma Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Pankaj Gupta Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J. 1. Heard Ms. Priyanshi Vishwakarma, learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Badrish Kumar Tripathi, learned State Counsel and perused the material brought on record. 2. This petition has been filed seeking the following main relief (s):- "i. issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opp.parties concerned to get complied the order dated 13.11.2024 passed byt he opp.party no. 2 in case no.7730/2024, computerised case no. 1202402570207730, Kamal and others vs. Sundarlal & others, under section 24, U. P. Revenue code 2006 as contained in Annexure no. lto this writ petition in letter and spirit and complete the proceedings of installations of stones (Patthargati) within stipulated time as provided by this Hon'ble court in the interest of justice. ii. issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opp.party no.3 to provide the police force, specially Mahila police force for compliance of the order dated 13.11.2024 as contained in Annexure no.l to this writ petition, passed by the opp. party no. 2, in the interest of justice." 3. In compliance of earlier order of this Court, Shri Shailendra Kumar Verma, Up-Ziladhikari, Tehsil Lalganj, District- Pratapgarh is present today before this Court 4. Based upon the instruction, copy of which is taken on record, the officer, who is present today before this Court, stated that in terms of the order dated 13.11.2024 the pillars have been affixed and this process was carried out on 06.04.2025. 5. At this state, learned counsel for the petitioner Ms. Priyanshi Vishwakarma stated that as per the information received the pillars so affixed have been disturbed by the private opposite party. 6. Taking note of the aforesaid, the present petition is disposed of finally with liberty to the petitioner to prefer an appropriate application before the concerned authority for taking action on the aforesaid subject which shall be considered and disposed of by the authority concerned most expeditiously as per law. Order Date :- 10.4.2025 Anand/- Digitally signed by :- ANAND KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench