SURENDRA PANDEY v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF REVENUE LKO AND 7 OTHERS
WRIC/2731/2025 · 2025-03-21
Om Prakash Shukla, Rajan Roy
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 129388 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 129388 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:16397-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 2731 of 2025 Petitioner :- Surendra Pandey Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Revenue Lko And 7 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Kartikay Singh,Vijay Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J. Heard. The allegation is that the opposite party No.8, a neighbour of the petitioner has put some material at the doorsteps of the petitioner. We fail to understand as to how a Writ Petition in such a matter is maintainable that too a Writ of Mandamus for protection of life, liberty and property. If there is a dispute between the private parties, the remedy lies elsewhere whether it be a civil, criminal and revenue law as the case may be, but, not under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The Writ Petition stands disposed of. (Om Prakash Shukla,J.) (Rajan Roy,J.) Order Date :- 21.3.2025 Saurabh Digitally signed by :- SAURABH VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench