Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 12936 (BOM)

TUSHAR SHANTARAM MALI v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLN/1242/2024 · 2025-06-30

Shri N B Suryawanshi, Shri Sandipkumar C More

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

{1} 3-appln-1242-2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1242 OF 2024 IN APEAL/292/2024 Tushar Shantaram Mali ….Applicant VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra & Another …..Respondents ….. Mr. S.B. Surse, Advocate for Applicant Mrs. S.N. Deshmukh, APP for State Mr. J.R. Shah, appointed Advocate for respondent No. 2 ....... CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, JJ. DATE : 30th JUNE, 2025 ORDER : 1. After arguing at length on merits, when this Court was not inclined to grant bail, learned advocate for the applicant, on instructions, seeks permission to withdraw the application. 2. Permission granted. 3. Criminal Application is dismissed as withdrawn. 4. High Court Legal Services, Sub Committee, Aurangabad, shall pay the fees of learned advocate appointed for respondent No. 2, as per schedule, within four weeks from today. (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.) (NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.) Bhagyawant Punde 2025:BHC-AUG:16507-DB