CR-6607-2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT Jora Singh Union of India CORAM : HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Present : Mr. Ranjit Saini, Advocate and Mr. Nitin Mehta, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Vikas Chatrath, Advocate Ms. Priya Kaushik, Advocate Ms. Preetleen Kaur, Advocat for respondent No.1 Mr. Brijesh, AAG, Punjab. LAPITA BANERJI In the present civil revision, the petitioner has challenged the inordinate delay in disposing the application under Section Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short ‘the 1996 Act’) Additional District Judge, Ferozepur application under Section 36 (2) of the 1996 Act bound manner. 2. Vide o this Court directed the Additional District Judge, Ferozepur to decide the application filed under Section 36(2) of the 1996 Act by this Court. A report to that effect was also c 3. Vide report dated informed by the learned Additional District Judge, Ferozepur that the 2024 Sr. No.113 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR Date of Decision : Versus India through NHAI and others HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Mr. Ranjit Saini, Advocate and Mr. Nitin Mehta, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Vikas Chatrath, Advocate, Ms. Priya Kaushik, Advocate and Ms. Preetleen Kaur, Advocate for respondent No.1-NHAI. Mr. Brijesh, AAG, Punjab. *** LAPITA BANERJI, J. (Oral) In the present civil revision, the petitioner has challenged the inordinate delay in disposing the application under Section Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short ‘the 1996 Act’) Additional District Judge, Ferozepur. The petitioner has prayed application under Section 36 (2) of the 1996 Act bound manner. Vide order dated November 13, 2024 this Court directed the Additional District Judge, Ferozepur to decide the application filed under Section 36(2) of the 1996 Act Court. A report to that effect was also c Vide report dated January 9, 2025 this Court informed by the learned Additional District Judge, Ferozepur that the IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR-6607-2024 Date of Decision : 12.03.2025 …Petitioner …Respondents HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI and In the present civil revision, the petitioner has challenged the inordinate delay in disposing the application under Section 36(2) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short ‘the 1996 Act’) by the . The petitioner has prayed that his application under Section 36 (2) of the 1996 Act to be decided in a time 2024, a Coordinate Bench of this Court directed the Additional District Judge, Ferozepur to decide the application filed under Section 36(2) of the 1996 Act, prior to the date fixed Court. A report to that effect was also called for. , 2025 this Court has been informed by the learned Additional District Judge, Ferozepur that the VANDANA 2025.03.18 10:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CR-6607-2024 application under Section 36(2) of the 1996 Act has been disposed of vide order dated January 8, 2025. 4. Accordingly, nothing further remains to be decided in the present civil revision as the grievance of the petitioner has been redressed. 5. Consequently, Civil Revision No.6607 of 2024 is disposed of. 6. Connected applications, if any, are also accordingly disposed of. (LAPITA BANERJI) JUDGE March 12, 2025 Vandana Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No VANDANA 2025.03.18 10:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document