PUSHPA TRADING COMPANY @ PUMP HOUSE SITAPUR THRU. PROPRIETOR PRABHAT KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. THE ADDL. SECY. PANCHAYATI RAJ U.P. LKO. AND 6 OTHERS
WRIC/2753/2025 · 2025-03-21
Om Prakash Shukla, Rajan Roy
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 129332 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 129332 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:16487-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 2753 of 2025 Petitioner :- Pushpa Trading Company @ Pump House Sitapur Thru. Proprietor Prabhat Kumar Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. The Addl. Secy. Panchayati Raj U.P. Lko. And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sikandar Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Dilip Kumar Pandey Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J.
1. Heard.
2. The petitioner claims to have provided certain material to the Gram Pradhan, who has been arrayed by name as opposite party No.6 for undertaking certain public works. Grievance is that he has not been paid the due amount, which according to him, is Rs.2,70,060/-, however, we do not find any agreement having entered into between the petitioner and Gram Pradhan nor any work order etc., having been issued, therefore, we cannot entertain such a petition in exercise of our extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner may avail other remedies. It is also open for the petitioner to approach the concerned authorities, who can get the matter inquired and if it is found that, in fact, petitioner had supplied the material on the asking of the Gram Pradhan for undertaking public works and certain amounts are due then it shall be ensured that needful is done and the due amount, if any, is paid.
3. With the aforesaid observations/directions, the writ petition is
disposed of. (Om Prakash Shukla, J.) (Rajan Roy, J.)
Order Date :- 21.3.2025 -Piyush- Digitally signed by :- PIYUSH YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench