Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 129322 (ALL)

RAJ KUMAR SONKAR AND 3 OTHERS v. RAJESH MAURYA AND 2 OHERS

A227/1531/2025 · 2025-03-27

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:17489 Court No. - 6 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 1531 of 2025 Petitioner :- Raj Kumar Sonkar And 3 Others Respondent :- Rajesh Maurya And 2 Ohers Counsel for Petitioner :- Mohammad Ehtesham Khan Counsel for Respondent :- Rakesh Kumar Srivastava,Chandan Srivastava,Lavkush Yadav Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J. 1. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner as well as Sri Rakesh Kumar Srivastava, learned Counsel for the respondents. 2. The present petition has been filed against an order of remand whereby the appellate authority had remanded the matter for fresh adjudication of the injunction application. 3. I do not see any reason to interfere with the said order, however, the petitioner was enjoying an interim order during the pendency of the suit and till the disposal of the appeal, it is directed that in terms of the remand, the civil judge shall pass fresh orders on the injunction application in accordance with law with all expedition preferably within a period of two months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order. It is however made clear that no unnecessary adjournment shall be granted to any of the parties. 4. For a period of two months or till the disposal of the injunction application, whichever is earlier, the parties shall maintain status quo. Order Date :- 27.3.2025 akverma Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench