Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:16754 Court No. - 7 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 2781 of 2025 Petitioner :- Dudhnath And Another Respondent :- Addl. Commissioner (Administration ), Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Dilip Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mohan Singh Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J. 1. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners, learned Standing Counsel for State-respondents and Shri Mohan Singh, learned counsel for Gram Sabha and Shri Arvind Kumar Mishra, Advocate, who has put in appearance on behalf of the respondent nos. 5 and 6, and has also filed Vakalatnama, which is taken on record. 2. By means of the present petition, the petitioners have sought following main relief : - "Issue a writ order or direction in the nature certiorari to quash the impugned judgment order dated 16.01.2025 passed by opposite party no.1 in Revision Case No. 2942 of 2024 (Computerized case No. C202404000002942) "Doodhnath and others Vs. State of U.P. and others" filed under section 210 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 as well as impugned order dated 29.10.2024 passed by opposite party no.2 in Case No. 509 of 2023 (Computerized Case No. D202304230000509) "Doodhnath and others Vs. State of U.P. and others" filed under section 30 (2) of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 (as contained in Annexure No. 1 & 2 to this writ petition), in the interest of justice." 3. After taking note of provisions of Sub-Rule 3 to 9 of Rule 26 of U.P. Revenue Code Rules, 2016 made under the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 as also certified copy of the report of lekhpal annexed as Annexure No. 6 from page nos. 82 to 88 of the paper-book, from a bare perusal of which it appears that Land Management Committee was not consulted, on being confronted, the learned counsel for the petitioners prays that the concerned authority may be directed to expedite the proceedings. Learned counsels for the respondents submit that they have no objection in case an expedite order is passed. Considering the facts and circumstances, this Court is of the opinion that no gainful purpose will be served in keeping the aforesaid petition. Accordingly, with the consent of the parties, the instant petition is disposed of directing the respondent No.3- Chief Revenue Officer, Ayodhya to consider and decide the pending proceedings, most expeditiously, after affording full opportunity of hearing to the parties, but without granting any unnecessary to either of the parties preferably within a period of three months from the next date fixed in the case, if possible and if there is no other legal impediment in this regard. It is made clear that this Court has not examined the case of either of the parties on merits and the authority concerned shall be free to decide the matter strictly in accordance with law. With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 24.3.2025 Mohit Singh/- Digitally signed by :- MOHIT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench