RSA-198-20 IN THE HIG 248 Punjab Singh Raninder Sin CORAM: H Present: - NIDHI GUP 1. judgment an District Judg plaintiff wa 21.07.2014 and the suit f throughout. 2. the appellan expired and on record th 15.11.2025 appellant has 3. best efforts, pursue the p pleaded ‘no 2017 (O&M) -1- E HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HA RSA Date o Singh Versus der Singh and others M: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDH Mr. Himanshu Puri, Advocate f I GUPTA, J. (ORAL) The appellant-defendant No. 1 ent and decree dated 08.09.2026, pass t Judge, Amritsar, vide which the app was allowed reversing the ju 2014, passed by the learned Civil Jud e suit for possession filed by responde hout. On the last date of hearing 08 pellant had informed that the sole app and sought time to move an approp ord the LRs of the deceased-appellan 2025, no application for impleading ant has been filed by learned counsel f Learned counsel for the appel fforts, the LRs of the deceased-appella the present appeal. As such, learned d ‘no instructions’ in the matter. ND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA-198-2017 (O&M) Date of Decision: 19.11.2025 .… Appellant .... Respondents NIDHI GUPTA ocate for the appellant. No. 1 is in second appeal against the , passed by the learned Additional he appeal filed by respondent No. 1- the judgment and decree dated vil Judge (Junior Division), Ajnala; pondent No. 1-plaintiff was decreed 08.01.2025, learned counsel for le appellant in the present case had appropriate application for bringing pellant. As per office report dated leading the LRs of the deceased- unsel for the appellant till date. appellant submits that despite his appellant are not coming forward to arned counsel for the appellant has onal ated ; reed l for had ging ated his d to has RISHU KATARIA 2025.11.21 17:37 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. RSA-198-20 4. long penden of more tha pursuing the counsel or to the appellant 5. disposed of 6. 19.11.2025 rishu 2017 (O&M) -2- In view of the facts noted abov endency of the present second appeal re than 08 years, the LRs of the ap ng the same, as no attempt has been m el or to engage a new counsel. It is, th pellant are not seriously interested in p Be that as it may, the insta ed of. Pending application(s), if any, s 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable d above, it appears that due to sheer ppeal before this Court for a period the appellant have lost interest in been made by them to contact their , therefore, clear that the LRs of ed in pursuing the present matter. instant regular second appeal is any, shall also stand disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No heer riod t in their s of l is RISHU KATARIA 2025.11.21 17:37 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.