1 CR-390-2008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Sr. No.120-2 CM-18135-CII-2025 IN/AND CR-390-2008 Date of Decision: 19.09.2025 BIHARI LAL ....Applicant/Petitioner Versus BHAJAN KAUR @ HARBHAJAN KAUR .....Non-applicant/Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ARCHANA PURI Present:- Mr. Kanwal Goyal, Advocate for the applicant/petitioner. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Chaubey, Advocate for non-applicant/respondent (Through video conferencing). ***** ARCHANA PURI, J. (Oral) CM-18135-CII-2025 has been filed under Order 23 Rule 3 CPC for disposal of the revision petition i.e. CR-390-2008, on the basis of the compromise deed dated 30.08.2025. The revision petition has been filed by the tenant to assail the order dated 23.10.2007, whereby an application for leave to defend, was dismissed. However, during the pendency of the revision, compromise has been effected between the parties, copy whereof is Annexure C-1. On the basis of the recitals of the said compromise, counsel for the applicant/petitioner submits that the vacant possession of the tenanted premises, has since been handed over to the respondent on 10.09.2025. Even, counsel for the respondent, who is making appearance through video conferencing, do not dispute about the genuineness of the said Sonu 2025.09.19 15:45 I agree to specified portions of this document P&HHC 2 CR-390-2008 compromise reached between the parties and admits that the vacant possession of the tenanted premises, has been received by the respondent. In the given circumstances, counsel for the applicant/petitioner submits that he does not want to pursue with the revision petition and the same be dismissed as withdrawn. Ordered accordingly. (ARCHANA PURI) 19.09.2025 JUDGE Sonu Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether reportable : Yes/No Sonu 2025.09.19 15:45 I agree to specified portions of this document P&HHC