Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 129265 (PNJ)

STATE OF HARYANA v. KEHAR SINGH

RFA/3806/2001 · 2025-12-01

Harkesh Manuja

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

RFA-380 118 (1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA State of Haryana and ors. Ram Kanwar and ors. CORAM: Present: HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) CM-3752 Pal is allowed applicant brought on record as legal representatives of Pal, to pursue the present appeal. on record. MAIN CASE: Haryana and ors. Vs. Om Parkash and ors. even date. 01.12.2025 sanjay 3804-2001 (O&M) [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ***** RFA No. Date of Decision: 01.12.2025 State of Haryana and ors. Versus Ram Kanwar and ors. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Present: Mr.Abhinash Jain, DAG, Haryana. Ms. Rashi Verma, Advocate for Mr. Vinay, Advocate for respondent No.6 (RFA-3804-2001). --- HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) 3752-CI-2025 Application for impleading LRs of respondent No.6 is allowed, as prayed for, subject to all just exceptions. The applicants mentioned in para 2 of the application are brought on record as legal representatives of to pursue the present appeal. Amended memo of partie on record. Registry to tag the same at appropriate place. MAIN CASE: For orders, see RFA No. Haryana and ors. Vs. Om Parkash and ors. even date. 01.12.2025 (HARKESH MANUJA) Whether speaking/reasoned? Whether Reportable? IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RFA No. 3804 of 2001 (O&M) Date of Decision: 01.12.2025 …….Appellants Versus ..….Respondent s HARKESH MANUJA Mr.Abhinash Jain, DAG, Haryana. Ms. Rashi Verma, Advocate for Mr. Vinay, Advocate for respondent No.6 for impleading LRs of respondent No.6-Chet , as prayed for, subject to all just exceptions. The para 2 of the application are ordered to be brought on record as legal representatives of respondent No.6- Chet Amended memo of parties is taken Registry to tag the same at appropriate place. For orders, see RFA No.3803-2001, tilted as State of Haryana and ors. Vs. Om Parkash and ors., decided vide order of (HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No Yes/No Chet , as prayed for, subject to all just exceptions. The ordered to be Chet s is taken State of , decided vide order of SANJAY GUPTA 2025.12.02 20:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document