Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 129261 (ALL)

BUDDHU PRAKASH @ BUDDHA PRAKASH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO AND ANOTHER

A482/2482/2025 · 2025-03-21

Manish Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:16368 Court No. - 14 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 2482 of 2025 Applicant :- Buddhu Prakash @ Buddha Prakash Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Gulam Rabbani Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. The present application has been filed with a prayer to quash the entire Rajesh Kumar and another, arising out of Case Crime No.162 of 2022; under sections- 420, 406, 504, 506 I.P.C., relating to the Police Station- Loni Katra, District- Barabanki, pending in the Court of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No.19, Barabanki, as well as impugned chargesheet no.191/22, dated 21.7.2022, submitted by the Investigating Officer against the petitioner, under sections- 420, 406, 504, 506 I.P.C., in aforesaid Case Crime No.162 of 2022 and impugned cognizance/summoning order dated 15.7.2023, passed by the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No.19, Barabanki. 3. After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that liberty may be given to the applicant to file bail application before the trial court which may be directed to be decided in view of law laid down by Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another, (2022) 10 S.C.R. 351 : (2022) 10 SCC 51 and Musheer Alam vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and Another, 2025 SCC Online SC 116, and also to prefer a discharge application before the court below and the same may also be directed to be decided expeditiously. 4. Learned A.G.A has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the applicant. 5. Keeping in view the aforesaid, the present application is disposed of with liberty as prayed for and with a direction to the court below that if the applicant applies for bail before the court concerned, prayer for bail shall be considered and decided expeditiously in accordance with law. 6. Taking note of the facts of the case and also the observations made by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Satendra Kumar Antil (Supra) and Musheer Alam (Supra), this Court is of the view that it would be appropriate to observe that it is expected from the Police Officer concerned that for a period of 30 days from today or till the applicant applies for bail, whichever is earlier, they would not take any coercive action against the applicant in the aforesaid case. Order Date :- 21.3.2025 DiVYa Digitally signed by :- DIVYA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench