Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 129254 (ALL)

SAROJ KUMAR PRAJAPATI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. FINANCE DEPTT. LKO. AND ANOTHER

WRIA/3080/2025 · 2025-03-20

Karunesh Singh Pawar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:16356 Court No. - 18 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 3080 of 2025 Petitioner :- Saroj Kumar Prajapati Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Finance Deptt. Lko. And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Birendra Kumar Yadav,Manoj Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Karunesh Singh Pawar,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for State-respondents. By this petition, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs:- "1) To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding and directing to the opposite parties to consider and grant promotion to the petitioner on the post of Group A, Level-II, Pay Band-3, pay scale of 15600-39100 and grade pay of Rs. 7600/-from date of juniors promotion along with all consequential service benefits including arrears of salary etc. 2) To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding and directing to the opposite parties to ignore the effect of the punishment order dated 27.04.2015 and consider for grant notional promotion to the petitioner on the post of Group A, Level-II, Pay Band-3, pay scale of 15600-39100 and grade pay of Rs. 6600/-w.e.f. 30.06.2016 from date of juniors promotion thereafter to allow all consequential service benefits, including arrears of salary etc, in the interest of justice." After arguing for sometime, learned counsel for the petitioner confines his prayer to the extent that the representation of the petitioner dated 03.01.2025, which is on record as Annexure-9, may be directed to be decided by respondent no.2. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to this innocuous prayer. Perused the record. Considering the above, the petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to move a fresh representation to respondent no.2 i.e. Director, Technical Education, U.P. Kanpur within two weeks' from today. If the petitioner submits a fresh representation, the respondent no.2 shall decide the same within four weeks' thereafter, by passing a speaking and reasoned order. Order Date :- 20.3.2025 Saurabh Yadav/- Digitally signed by :- SAURABH YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench