Tr.CMP.(MD)No.230 of 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 01.08.2025 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.K. RAMAKRISHNAN Tr.CMP.(MD)No.230 of 2025 and C.M.P.(MD)No.5850 of 2025 K.Ishwarya .. Petitioner Vs. R.Arunkumar .. Respondent Prayer : Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition is filed under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, to withdraw the case in H.M.O.P.No.1368 of 2024 on the file of the Family Court, Madurai, Madurai District, and transfer the same to the Family Court, Sivagangai, Sivagangai District. For Petitioner : Mr.S.T.Sasidharan Tamilkani For Respondent : Mr.S.Prakash https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Tr.CMP.(MD)No.230 of 2025 ORDER The present Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed to withdraw the case in H.M.O.P.No.1368 of 2024 on the file of the Family Court, Madurai, Madurai District, and transfer the same to the Family Court, Sivagangai, Sivagangai District. 2. The petitioner is the wife and the respondent is the husband. The marriage between the petitioner and the respondent was solemnized on 04.06.2017 at Arulmigu Sivapuripatti Sivan Temple, as per the Hindu Rites and Customs. 3. Due to some matrimonial discord, the parties have separated. Therefore, the respondent/husband filed H.M.O.P.No.1368 of 2024, on the file of the Family Court, Madurai, seeking divorce. The petitioner/wife has filed the H.M.O.P.No.229 of 2024 on the file of the Family Court, Sivagangai, seeking restitution of conjugal rights. 4. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner/wife submits https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Tr.CMP.(MD)No.230 of 2025 that his client is living in Vengaipatti, Singampunari Taluk, Sivagangai District and she was taken care of by her parents. The distance between the petitioner's residence to Madurai, is around 46 Kms, and being a lady, she finds it difficult to travel such a long distance for attending every Court hearing. She has also filed the petition in H.M.O.P.No.229 of 2024 before the Family Court, Sivagangai. Hence, she seeks transfer of proceedings in H.M.O.P.No.1368 of 2024 from the file of the Family Court, Madurai, to the file of the Family Court, Sivagangai. 5. The learned counsel for the respondent entered appearance and he vehemently opposed to allow this petition. 6. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned counsel for the respondent and perused the materials available on records. 7. In the case of N.C.V.Aishwarya Vs. A.S.Saravana Karthik Sha reported in 2022 Live Law (SC) 627, the Hon'ble Supreme Court has dealt https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Tr.CMP.(MD)No.230 of 2025 with the position generally, that it is the wife's convenience, which must be looked into while considering the transfer petition under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure and the relevant passage is extracted hereunder : “The cardinal principle for exercise of power under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure is that the ends of justice should demand the transfer of the suit, appeal or other proceeding. In matrimonial matters, wherever Courts are called upon to consider the plea of transfer, the Courts have to take into consideration the economic soundness of both the parties, the social strata of the spouses and their behavioural pattern, their standard of life prior to the marriage and subsequent thereto and the circumstances of both the parties in eking out their livelihood and under whose protective umbrella they are seeking their sustenance to life. Given the prevailing socioeconomic paradigm in the Indian society, generally, it is the wife's convenience which must be looked at while considering transfer.", the bench observed.” 8. It is also well settled proposition of law that whenever a transfer petition is filed in matrimonial disputes, the convenience of the wife should be predominantly looked into, and the wife’s convenience shall be given preference. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Tr.CMP.(MD)No.230 of 2025 9. Considering the overall facts and circumstances of the case and also taking into account of the inconvenience expressed by the petitioner in attending every court hearing, by travelling two hours journey to reach the Family Court, Madurai, situated 46 kms away from her Domicile, namely, Vengaipatti, Singampunari Taluk, Sivagangai District, incurring huge expense, this court inclines to allow the petition. 10. The learned District Judge, Family Court, Madurai, is hereby directed to transfer the entire records pertaining to the case, in H.M.O.P.No. 1368 of 2024, to the file of the learned District Judge, Family Court, Sivagangai, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, and on receipt of such records, the learned learned District Judge, Family Court, Sivagangai, is directed to take the case on file, try the same along with H.M.O.P.No.229 of 2024 filed by the petitioner/wife and dispose of the cases as expeditiously as possible in accordance with law. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Tr.CMP.(MD)No.230 of 2025 11. Accordingly, this Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition stands allowed. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, the connected Civil Miscellaneous Petition is closed. 01.08.2025 Index :Yes/No Speaking Order :Yes/No Neutral Citation :Yes/No TM To 1.The District Judge, Family Court, Madurai. 2.The District Judge, Family Court, Sivagangai. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Tr.CMP.(MD)No.230 of 2025 K.K. RAMAKRISHNAN , J. TM Tr.CMP.(MD)No.230 of 2025 and C.M.P.(MD)No.5850 of 2025 01.08.2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis