MAYAWATI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. SOCIAL WELFARE DEPTT. LKO. AND 5 OTHERS
WRIA/3073/2025 · 2025-04-04
Rajesh Singh Chauhan
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 129235 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 129235 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:18777 Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 3073 of 2025 Petitioner :- Mayawati Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Social Welfare Deptt. Lko. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Kiran Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Sanjeev Singh, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents.
2. By means of present writ petition, the petitioner has prayed following reliefs:
"[i] issue a writ order or direction in the nature of Certiorari thereby quashing the order dated 17.1.2025 passed by the opposite party no. 2 as cpntained in ANNEXURE NO. 2 to this writ petition, [II] issue a writ order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the opp. parties to allow the petitioner to work on her post of Mali / Class IV post and pay her honorarium regularly each and every month ads and when it falls due along with arrears since 2.7.2024 upto date."
3. However, after arguing at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner has requested that he may be permitted to not press this writ petition at this stage to approach the competent authority for redressal of grievance of the petitioner.
4. Considering the aforesaid request, this writ petition is dismissed being not pressed with the aforesaid liberty.
5. It is needless to say that while approaching the competent authority, if the petitioner is having other grievance regarding arrears of stipend etc., the same may be claimed and such grievance may be considered strictly in accordance with law. Order Date :- 4.4.2025 Anupam S/- Digitally signed by :- ANUPAM SINGH PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench