KALAM ANSARI @ ABDUL KALAM v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME U.P. LKO. AND ANOTHER
NABAIL/261/2025 · 2025-03-25
Manish Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 129230 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 129230 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:16906 Court No. - 13 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 261 of 2025 Applicant :- Kalam Ansari @ Abdul Kalam Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home U.P. Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Dinesh Kr. Chaudhary Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Manish Mathur,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for applicant and learned A.G.A. for the opposite party-State.
2. First anticipatory bail application has been filed with regard to Case Crime No.216 of 2024, under Sections 299, 353 (3), 196 BNS, P.S. Tulsipur, District Balrampur.
3. As per contents of FIR, the applicant had uploaded obscene comments about religious figure of a particular religion.
4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that although the comments may have been uploaded from his mobile but the same in fact has been uploaded by someone else by hacking his mobile.
5. On the basis of instructions, however, he submits that he may be permitted to not press the present anticipatory bail application but liberty may be given to avail the remedy of filing regular bail in light of the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil versus Central Bureau of Investigation and another, Special Leave to Appeal (Cri) No.5191 of 2021.
6. Considering the aforesaid submission, the anticipatory bail application is dismissed with the aforesaid liberty. Order Date :- 25.3.2025 Renu/- Digitally signed by :- RENU AGARWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench