Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 129224 (ALL)

RAM PATI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT AND 3 OTHERS

WRIA/3079/2025 · 2025-03-20

Rajesh Singh Chauhan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:16249 Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 3079 of 2025 Petitioner :- Ram Pati Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Urban Development And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vikrant Prakash,Manjari Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Anil Kumar Tripathi,Shivam Pandey Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J. 1. Heard Sri Vikrant Prakash and Ms. Manjari Singh, learned counsels for the petitioner, Sri Pradeep Kumar Singh, learned Addl. Chief Standing Counsel for the State-opposite parties no.1 & 2 and Sri Ajeetanshu Tripathi, holding brief of Sri Anil K. Tripathi, learned counsel for the Nagar Palika Parishad, Gonda. 2. By means of this petition, the petitioner has prayed following main reliefs:- "i. An order or direction, writ in the nature of Mandamus commanding the respondents, particularly Respondent No. 3 i.e. Executive Officer, Nagar Palika Parishad, District- Gonda, to ensure immediate payment of the retiral dues of the petitioner. ii. An order or direction, writ in the nature of Mandamus commanding the respondents to consider and decide the representations of the petitioner dated 19.12.2024, 25.12.2024, 17.01.2025, 20.01.2025, and 03.02.2025 annexed as Annexure Nos. 1 to 5 respectively to instant writ petition expeditiously, within a stipulated time frame as may be fixed by this Hon'ble Court." 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that for redressal of the aforesaid grievance, the petitioner has preferred representations to the competent authority, but to no avail. Learned counsel for the petitioner has also submitted that the petitioner may be permitted to prefer a fresh representation before opposite party no.3 and this Court may direct opposite party no.3 to pass appropriate order strictly in accordance with law. 4. Learned counsels for the opposite parties have no objection if direction for disposal of the representation is issued. 5. Therefore, without entering into merits of the issue, the petitioner is permitted to prefer a fresh representation to opposite party no.3 i.e. Executive Officer, Nagar Palika Parishad, District- Gonda taking all pleas and grounds, which are necessary for disposal of the representation and also enclosing the earlier representations, if any, alongwith certified copy of this order within a period of fifteen days from today. If such representation is preferred by the petitioner within the aforesaid stipulated time, the authority concerned shall consider and dispose of the aforesaid representation of the petitioner by speaking and reasoned order, strictly in accordance with law, with expedition, say within a period of two months from the date of receipt of the representation and thereafter communicate the decision thereof to the petitioner forthwith. 6. With the aforesaid direction, the writ petition is disposed of finally. [Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.] Order Date :- 20.3.2025 RBS/- Digitally signed by :- RAM BIR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- RAM BIR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench