Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 12921 (JHR)

DINESH KUMAR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./4975/2025 · 2025-06-24

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:JHHC:16803] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.4975 of 2025 ------ Dinesh Kumar, Aged about 48 years, S/o Late Ram Chandra Ram, R/o- Rail Por, Srinagar, BPL Quarter, Asansol, P.O.- Asansol & P.S.- North Thana Asansol, District- Burdwan (West Bengal) .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Shekhar Prasad Sinha, Advocate For the State : Mrs. Mohua Palit, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated-24-06-2025 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Bistupur P.S. Case No.215 of 2024 registered for the offence punishable under Section 406, 420, 409, 468, 471, 472 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner committed criminal breach of trust, cheating and forgery for the purpose of cheating. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is then submitted that though the petitioner is not named in the FIR yet he has been implicated in this case only on the basis of inculpatory statement of the co-accused. It is then submitted that there is no allegation of entrustment of any money to the petitioner in the FIR. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 26.02.2025 as is evident from para-9 of the instant bail application. It is further submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner also undertakes to co- operate with the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned CJM, Jamshedpur in connection with Bistupur P.S. Case No.215 of 2024 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the informant or witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Saroj/