Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 129207 (ALL)

SMT. RANI v. MADHYANCHAL VIDYUT VITARAN NIGAM LTD. LKO. THRU. MANAGING DIRECTOR AND 12 OTHERS

WRIC/2762/2025 · 2025-03-21

Om Prakash Shukla, Rajan Roy

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:16414-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 2762 of 2025 Petitioner :- Smt. Rani Respondent :- Madhyanchal Vidyut Vitaran Nigam Ltd. Lko. Thru. Managing Director And 12 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Farhan Abbas,Abhishek Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- Aprajita Bansal Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J. 1. Heard. 2. After hearing the parties, what comes out is that the electricity connection on the premises was in the name of the mother, who has expired and according to the Counsel for the Electricity Corporation, there is some dispute between her sons and daughters with regard to the property and some suit proceedings are pending. The petitioner wants electricity connection in her name. If the petitioner and other occupants of the premises want an electricity connection in their name and submit an application as per rules, the same can be processed and such decision as is required in law, can be taken by the competent authority unless there is any legal impediment. Let this be done at the earliest say within a period of two months. 3. With the aforesaid observations/directions, the writ petition is disposed of. (Om Prakash Shukla, J.) (Rajan Roy, J.) Order Date :- 21.3.2025 -Piyush- Digitally signed by :- PIYUSH YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench