CRM-M-3403 and other connected cases IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT 275 (1) CRM SUBHASH V/S SURENDER (2) CRM SUBHASH V/S SURENDER (3) CRM SUBHASH V/S SURENDER (4) CRM SUBHASH V/S SURENDER CORAM: Present: AMAN CHAUDHARY 1. were six complaints filed by the complainant against the petitioner under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, wherein he was summoned and against which, except this case, revisions was filed before the Court of Session, which was the remedy available in accordance with law. 2. withdrawal of the present petition to avail the said remedy, however, 3403-2020 (O&M) 1 and other connected cases IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-3403-2020 (O&M) SUBHASH V/S SURENDER CRM-M-4807-2020 (O&M) SUBHASH V/S SURENDER CRM-M-4853-2020 (O&M) SUBHASH V/S SURENDER CRM-M-4855-2020 (O&M) SUBHASH V/S SURENDER HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Ms. Neha Rani, Advocate for Mr. R.N. Lohan, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Rajesh Goyal, Advocate for the respondent. ------ AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel appearing for the respondent states that there were six complaints filed by the complainant against the petitioner under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, wherein he was summoned and against which, except this case, revisions was filed before the Court of Session, which was the remedy available in accordance with law. In view of the above, learned counsel fo withdrawal of the present petition to avail the said remedy, however, IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision: 29.10.2025 AMAN CHAUDHARY for the petitioner. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent states that there were six complaints filed by the complainant against the petitioner under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, wherein he was summoned and against which, except this case, revisions was filed before the Court of Session, which was the remedy available in accordance with law. In view of the above, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks withdrawal of the present petition to avail the said remedy, however, prays Learned counsel appearing for the respondent states that there were six complaints filed by the complainant against the petitioner under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, wherein he was summoned and against which, except this case, revisions was filed before the Court of r the petitioner seeks prays HIMANSHU 2025.10.31 10:41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-3403 and other connected cases that delay may not come in the way, to which learned counsel opposite no objection. 3. period of 4 weeks, the same shall be decided on merits, in accordance with law. 4. 29.10.2025 himanshu 3403-2020 (O&M) 2 and other connected cases that delay may not come in the way, to which learned counsel opposite no objection. Ordered accordingly. In case, the revision is preferred within period of 4 weeks, the same shall be decided on merits, in accordance with A photocopy of this order be placed on the connected files. (AMAN CHAUDHARY Whether speaking/reasoned: Whether reportable: that delay may not come in the way, to which learned counsel opposite has Ordered accordingly. In case, the revision is preferred within a period of 4 weeks, the same shall be decided on merits, in accordance with A photocopy of this order be placed on the connected files. AMAN CHAUDHARY) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No has a period of 4 weeks, the same shall be decided on merits, in accordance with HIMANSHU 2025.10.31 10:41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document