Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 129158 (ALL)

ANIL ARORA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME GOVT. OF U.P. LKO. AND ANOTHER

A482/2464/2025 · 2025-04-02

Alok Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:18182 Court No. - 12 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 2464 of 2025 Applicant :- Anil Arora Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Govt. Of U.P. Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Himanshu Kumar Trivedi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J. 1. Heard Sri HImanshu Kumar Trivedi, learned counsel for petitioner as well as learned Additional Government Advocate for State. 2. The present appeal has been filed for quashing the impugned summoning order dated 25.10.2023 under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 in Complaint Case NO. 10500/2019 issed by Presiding Officer, Additional Court NO. 11, Lucknow. 3. Learned counsel for appellant, after arguing at some length submits that grievance of the appellant shall be redressed in case liberty is granted to the appellant to file a bail application which may be decided in view of law laid down by Supreme Court in "Satender Kumar Antil versus Central Bureau of Investigation and another, Special Leave to Appeal (Cri)No.5191 of 2021" to which learned A.G.A. has no objection. 4. In view of the above, prayer for quashing the impugned proceeding is refused. So far as other prayer is concerned, it is provided that in case the appellant appears before the trial court within two weeks from today and applies for bail, the same shall be decided expeditiously, in view of the law laid down by Supreme Court in Satender Kumar Antil's case (supra). 5. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. (Alok Mathur, J.) Order Date :- 2.4.2025 Ravi/ Digitally signed by :- RAVI SHANKAR SRIVASTAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench