Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 129157 (MAD)

G. Maruthi Karthikeyan v. The State of Tamil Nadu,

CRL OP(MD)/5466/2025 · 2025-03-25

P Dhanabal

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Crl.O.P(MD)No.5466 of 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 25.03.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P. DHANABAL Crl.O.P(MD)No.5466 of 2025 G. Maruthi Karthikeyan ... Petitioner Vs 1. The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by the Superintendent of Police, Thoothukudi. 2. The Inspector of Police, Kadambur Police Station, Thoothukudi District. 3. Mahendran ... Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original petition has been filed under Section 528 of BNSS to direct the 2nd respondent not to harass the petitioner under the guise of enquiry based on the complaint given by the 3rd respondent. For Petitioner : Mr.Chidambaram. G, For R1 and R2 : Mr.M.Sakthi Kumar Government Advocate (Crl.Side) 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P(MD)No.5466 of 2025 O R D E R This Criminal Original Petition has been filed seeking a direction to the second respondent not to harass the petitioner under the guise of enquiry based on the complaint given by the third respondent. 2.When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police would submit that based on the complaint lodged by the third respondent, the respondent police called the petitioner for enquiry and thereafter, the main complaint itself was closed. The respondent police have not harassed the petitioner as alleged by him. 3.Considering the limited scope of the prayer sought for in this petition, this Court, without even issuing notice to the private respondent, is inclined to pass order. 4.Since the main complaint itself was closed and the second respondent submitted that he called the petitioner for enquiry purpose, based on the private respondent's complaint, nothing survives for further 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P(MD)No.5466 of 2025 adjudication in this matter. 5.Accordingly, this criminal original petition is closed. 25.03.2025 Internet :Yes Index :Yes/No NCC :Yes/No LR To 1. The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by the Superintendent of Police, Thoothukudi. 2. The Inspector of Police, Kadambur Police Station, Thoothukudi District. 3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P(MD)No.5466 of 2025 P. DHANABAL, J. LR Crl.O.P(MD)No.5466 of 2025 25.03.2025 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis