119 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-1158-2025 Date of Decision: January 17, 2025 Karanveer Singh …Pe00oner Versus Punjab State Power Corporaon Ltd. and another …Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA Present:- Mr. Shrey Goel, Advocate for the peoner. DEEPAK GUPTA , J.(Oral) In order to claim the relief as prayed in this writ peon, peoner had made representaon dated 17.12.2024 (Annexure P-7) to the respondents. 2. It is submi-ed by learned counsel for the peoner that a.er making that representaon, certain addional facts have come to his knowledge and he wants to move fresh representaon. The main grievance of the peoner is regarding non-inclusion of backlog vacancies in the category of Scheduled Caste for filling up the post of Assistant Engineer in the discipline of Electrical Engineer. 3. Noce of moon. 4. Mr. Maninderjit Singh Bedi, Advocate has put in appearance and filed memo of appearance on behalf of the respondents. 5. In view of the aforesaid statement made by learned counsel for the peoner, present peon is hereby disposed of with a direcon that the peoner will be at liberty to file fresh representaon before the respondents within a period of 02 weeks from today and upon receiving of such representaon, the respondents shall take a decision thereon within next two months by passing a speaking order. January 17, 2025 (DEEPAK GUPTA) sarita JUDGE Whether reasoned/speaking: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No Sarita Rani 2025.01.17 14:38 I attest to the accuracy of this document/order